events · linguistics

My talk @ 4. Linguistik Meetup in Berlin

It’s a hot morning on August 4th in Berlin, summer holidays are already on… But at the Institute of German Language and Linguistics of Humboldt Uni there’s much ado about something: the 4th Linguistics Meetup Berlin-Potsdam!

This is an annual event intended to bring together BA/MA/PhD students of Linguistics from Humboldt-, Free-, Technical Universities of Berlin and Potsdam University, to present their research interests, projects, or theses. It’s a great opportunity to get out of our own uni-caves, exhange ideas and get feedback from other students, while honing our presentation skills. The meetup doesn’t set a theme, talks and posters are accepted from all branches of linguistics. Corpus analyses of 18th century texts and fundraising letters, learning/teaching German as second/foreign language, mnemonics for language learning, typology, voice therapy, medical and law terminology, and clinical linguistics were presented in the 4 posters and 12 talks that made up this year’s programme

I participated with a talk about the impairment of concrete and abstract words in semantic dementia (SD). My interest in this topic was awoken a couple of months ago, in a seminar on the development of the mental lexicon, and because I’m fascinated by all (language) disorders, I wrote the term paper on SD. This Meetup was a good occassion to discuss with other students some open questions in the literature and future research. For a start, SD is a progressive neurodegenerative disease of Alzheimer’s type (AD), caused by brain cells dying off. Unlike AD, SD appears earlier in life (45-65 years old), originating in the temporal lobes and more often in the left one, which is known to be reponsible for language comprehension. A person with SD would speak fluently, but wouldn’t make a lot of sense, she’d have difficulties naming or recognizing objects (e.g., see a cup and not know what it is or how to use it), and in time would use more general terms instead of specific names (e.g. animal instead of cat, or thing for different objects). An interesting aspect is that word categories seem to be differently impaired: SD patients are better at non-living things (e.g., hammer) than living things (e.g., dog), words from different categories (e.g., banana, nose) than from the same category (e.g., shoes, gloves), concrete words (e.g., cabbage, bus) than abstract words (e.g., freedom, honesty). This is known as concreteness effect and holds also for the general population. Here however there are some curious cases of reverse concreteness effects in SD, where patients know abstract words better than concrete words, but up to date there’s no clear explanation for this. Also unclear is to what extent are different categories impaired, for example whether body parts are better preserved than tools.

To put a hman face on this disorder, the Monty Python star Terry Jones was diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia in 2015, and at the Bafta ceremony 2016 he could only articulate “quieten down”. Another case study that impressed me is that of Iris Murdoch, the prolific British writer, best known for the novel The sea, the Sea which won the Booker Prize in 1978. However, her last novel Jackson’s Dilemma (1995) was surprisingly weak and critics commented on her simple, at times incoherent writing style. Shortly afterwards, Iris Murdoch was diagnosed with AD, confirmed after her death in 1999. What does this have to do with literature? Apparently her “poor writing style” actually revealed signs of her cognitive decline. A team of researchers carried out a computer text analysis of three of her novels: Under the Net (1954), The Sea, the Sea (1978), and Jackson’s Dilemma (1995). They found that the last novel had a limited vocabulary, with highly frequent and more repeated words, compared to the other two. These are characterictics of SD and AD, which unfortunately were not recognized at the time. This study suggests how creative writing could be an insightful assessment of people with or even at risk of dementia. By analyzing various word features (e.g., concreteness, imageability, emotion, frequency, semantic category), along with research on the neural representation of words, could indicate earlier signs of different forms of dementia.

After surviving my 25-minute talk, it was time for more coffee, more networking, and a nice picnick at the end of the day…


Some references:

  • Cherkow, H. & Bub, D. (1990). Semantic memory loss in dementia of Alzheimer’s type. Brain, 113, 397–417.
  • Garrard, P. et al. (2005). The effects of very early Alzheimer’s disease on the characteristics of writing by a renowned author. Brain, 128, 250–260.
  • Hoffman, P. & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2011). Reverse concreteness effects are not a typical feature of semantic dementia: Evidence for the hub-and-spoke model of conceptual representation. Cerebral Cortex, 21(9), 2103–2112.
  • Jefferies, E. et al. (2009). Comprehension of concrete and abstract words in semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 23, 492–499.

 

One thought on “My talk @ 4. Linguistik Meetup in Berlin

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s