At the beginning of the new year 2021, Kaggle created a new format of competitions aimed at beginners. On the 1st of each month, a month-long Playground competition is launched, where you can practice your ML skills on simple tabular datasets. Apart from competitive experience, the top 3 teams get to win some Kaggle merchandise!

Exploratory Analysis

January’s challenge is about regression and contains a tabular dataset split into train and test sets.

The train set contains 300.000 data points with 14 features (continuous between 0 and 1) and 1 target variable (continuous between 6 and 10). The test set, used for making predictions, contains 200.000 data points with the same 14 features. The results are evaluated with the RMSE score.

First of all, I did a quick exploratory analysis. I was mainly interested in the correlation matrix, since in datasets with lots of features like this one, it’s likely that some of the variables are correlated – and it turned out this was the case:


ML Models

Moving on to the modelling part, I first split the train set further into a train and test set, then tried out four models:

  • Linear Regression just for fun, though I expected it to be too simplistic for this data set.
  • Random Forest Regressor with and without Recursive Feature Elimination. Contrary to my expectation, I got a better score with all features included.
  • Gradient Boosting Regressor with 100 estimators and a depth of 5 was slightly better that RFR.
  • XGBoost with GridSearchCV for finding the optimal hyperparameters. As expected, this model performed best, with little tweaking and from what I see it’s widely used in Kaggle competitions.


I submitted the predictions made by each model on Kaggle and here are the RMSE scores I achieved:

XGBoost 0.69995
Gradient Boosting 0.70723
Random Forest Regressor 0.71094
Random Forest Regressor + RFE 0.71459
Linear Regression 0.724

My best score placed me on position 281 out of 913. As always, there’s room for improvement, maybe by tweaking the XGBoost hyperparameters or trying out other models.

In conclusion, though the data set was uninformative and not really insightful, this Kaggle challenge was a good exercise for trying out regression models.